Cost–effectiveness analysis of prostate-specific antigen screening in China: a middle-income population-based microsimulation study

Publication Date
2025-09-25
Journal
The Lancet Regional Health Western Pacific
Author(s)
Jiacheng Liu, Yuanshi Jiao, Yueting Huang, Yongle Zhan, Ruofan Shi, Xiaohao Ruan, Chi Yao, Ruochen Ma, Salida Ali, Tsun Tsun Chun, Da Huang, Danfeng Xu, Qian Zhang,Di Gu, Xue Li and Rong Na
Abstract

Summary

Background
The significance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in reducing the health burden of prostate cancer is widely deliberated. We conducted this study, utilising real-world data, to develop a comprehensive, cost-effectiveness analysis model for PSA screening. By evaluating various screening strategies, we aim to provide policymakers with robust research evidence to inform future PSA screening policies.

Methods
We constructed a microsimulation model to assess 56 conventional population-wide PSA screening strategies based on data from a five-year trial with 104,751 participants, a 20-year multicentre database and parameters collected across China, along with approaches involving genetic risk stratification based on family history, polygenic risk scores, and high-penetrance genes. Clinical outcomes including incidence, metastasisincidence ratio (M/I ratio), and annual case-fatality rate (CFR) were evaluated. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated using incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the results.

Findings
All strategies led to QALY gains and were considered cost-effective under a willingness-to-pay threshold equal to China’s per capita GDP ($12,510.12 per QALY). The most intensive protocol (45–74 years, annually, with age-specific PSA cutoffs) had an ICER of 5535.25USD/QALY, yielding 2.79 incremental QALYs compared to non-screening, reducing M/I ratio from 39.05% to 1.04%, and CFR from 6.14% to 2.85%. The genetic risk-specific protocol offered comparable QALYs (2.79 vs. 2.76) and ICERs (5287.23 vs. 4904.90USD/ QALY), allowing for 66.8% of average-risk individuals with extended screening intervals or postponed screening start age.

Interpretation
PSA screening in China has the potential to improve overall health outcomes in a cost-effective manner. Personalised screening based on genetic risk may provide an efficient alternative to uniform strategies, potentially reducing unnecessary interventions among those at lower risk. This study provides a solid evidence base for Chinese policymakers to consider establishing a cost-effective, risk-stratified PCa screening programme.